Did AOC’s bespoke dress send the message it wanted?
Tickets cost $ 35,000 per person. A table can cost over $ 200,000. The hall is packed with some of the world’s richest celebrities, wearing thousand dollar dresses and costumes, at an event meant to celebrate, in many ways, excess itself.
Here at the infamous annual Met Gala, it’s where New York City Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez chose to make a political statement, using her own ticket and custom designer dress, to do it: “Tax the Rich,” her Aurora James- designed Brother Vellies dress read.
“Now is the time for child care, healthcare and climate action for all. Tax the rich, ”reads the accompanying Instagram post.
Except, as well-intentioned as it may have been, it’s not yet clear whether people will actually be talking about taxes, child care, health care or the climate in the wake of the Ocasio waterfall. – Get out. So far, they are only talking about the stunt itself, and whether that is hypocritical of the MP.
“AOC is branded a hypocrite for donning an Aurora James dress personalized with ‘taxing the rich’,” the report reads. Daily Mail Title.
“Powerful or hypocrite? AOC’s “Tax the Rich” dress at the Met Gala elicits mixed reactions, “per United States today.
“AOC wears ‘Tax The Rich’ dress at $ 30,000 per Met Gala ticket”, at Foxnews.com.
Ocasio-Cortez has positioned itself as the voice of the little people – the underserved and under-represented. Because of this – with a bit of sexism and a lot of rank partisanship – she is regularly called out for her “hypocrisy” and demeanor more worthy of big wigs than little people.
There was his $ 300 haircut, and the predictable hubbub Who followed. There was a time when she would have parked illegally his Tesla behind a DC Whole Foods, and the scandal that followed. And the blanket of its hefty Uber, Lyft and plane bills, despite Green New Deal sponsorship and pressure to end our use of fossil fuels.
She is blame this scrutiny of the “ravenous hysteria” of her detractors, and she’s right. When she posted an incredibly moving account of her experience during the January uprising, wondering aloud if she would live to be a mother and admitting that she had been sexually assaulted before, her panting Republican critics took to heart. mocked, rejected and discredited her.
But there is also a bit of inconvenient truth, so to speak, about the idea that public officials should be held to their own standards and to practice their principles and intellectual consistency. It has little to do with haircuts and parking spots, but a lot to do with the intersection of a politician’s prescribed policies and personal lifestyle choices.
This is where some of his detractors go wrong when he last met the Falcons of Hypocrisy. Wearing a dress that says “tax the rich” in front of a group of wealthy people is not hypocritical. If anything it’s bold enough.
Ocasio-Cortez explained that she intended the message explicitly to those in that room, “because when we talk about supporting working families and when we talk about having a fair tax code, these conversations often take place between workers and the middle classes. “
While not hypocrisy, Ocasio-Cortez’s Met Gala stunt is certainly the victim of confusing and confusing messages.
If the idea was to expose the scourge of economic inequality at a posh event like the Met Gala, she certainly enjoyed all the perks of being a wealthy person that night, from her chauffeured commute to her. using the chic Carlyle Hotel to get ready, her celebrity hairstylists and makeup artists, her custom dress and $ 450 earrings, and rubbing shoulders with Kendall Jenner, Anna Wintour and wealthy celebrities.
The designer she chose to wear and promote, Brother Vellies, sells shoes for over $ 700 a pair, bags for $ 1,500, a comb for $ 95 and coffee for $ 35. These are beautiful luxuries that are presumably backed by wealthy people who can afford them – the wealthy people Ocasio-Cortez and the brand’s creator are targeting with the anti-rich message. So, does the brand want more customers … or scalps?
Would it have been more meaningful to push back the glitzy event and the wealthy participants to protest against economic inequality? Or show up in cheap clothes and dressed like an official, instead of a Hollywood star? Or donate what would have been the cost of her designer dress, accessories, travel and accommodation to an organization that fights against income inequalities?
I don’t regret Ocasio-Cortez’s attempt to use her platform to publicize issues that interest her, nor do I think she is witnessing a glitzy event necessarily making her a hypocrite. And I hope Brother Vellies’ sales will skyrocket because of her promotion (and the rich people she wants to tax).
But I also don’t know what the dress accomplished, other than being talking about it today – maybe not the way she hoped it would. Or, as is often the case with AOC’s savvy penchant for advertising, maybe exactly the way she hoped.
Send letters to [email protected].